Click here to read the NYT “Room for Debate” series piece on homelessness and housing policy. The article features six different “view points” on homelessness. Conservative writers from the Manhattan Institute and the American Enterprise Institute argue against embracing affordable housing for all, continuing the usual pattern of blaming the homeless for their own state of homelessness and using the “deserving” citizen/”undeserving” citizen paradigm that has been established for decades in conservative literature on welfare policy. Four of the authors featured in the series work directly with people experiencing homelessness, and with social sector organizations and government agencies responsible for housing and homelessness policies. These authors advocate for housing for all and some explore the nuances of serving those with addiction recovery needs and mental health services needs.